![]() |
| Photo: Photos By Peter DaSilva / Special To The Chronicle |
Click here to read the article.
![]() |
| Photo: Photos By Peter DaSilva / Special To The Chronicle |

(Photo: Scott Strazzante, The Chronicle) |
Between 2000 and 2006, the number of drug offenders in federal prison jumped 26 percent, to 93,751. An additional 250,000 are incarcerated in state facilities and thousands more sit in local jail cells.At an average cost of roughly $25,000 per year to incarcerate an individual, that translates to about $8.6 billion spent each year on incarcerated drug offenders. This figure does not take into account thousands more offenders incarcerated for crimes other than drug offense, but whose addiction fuels their offenses (like stealing to support a drug habit). Most agree that incarceration does not help people overcome their addiction or end the cycle of criminal behavior.
The most ambitious program so far is California's Proposition 36, which offers convicted nonviolent drug offenders family counseling and job training in addition to treatment. Since the initiative was approved by voters in 2000, more than 36,000 people have been diverted into treatment every year.Though there are some successes, the challenges are great. Newsweek does a good job bringing attention to some of the biggest problems, like high drop-out rates and a lack of adequate funding.
Even as attitudes shift, the federal government still budgets far more for stopping drug flow and enforcing drug laws ($8.3 billion this year) than it does for treatment and prevention ($4.6 billion). Treatment programs are un derstaffed. Medications like methadone help some addicts, but harm others. Quitting is a grueling proposition. As a result, less than 10 percent of people who need treatment actually get it. And the proportion of people staying in treatment is "horrendously low," says David Gustafson of the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment. New science may change all that one day. But for now, the battle goes on.

Dill is believed to be the only probation officer-on-wheels working with homeless people in the country, a simple idea for which he recently won the California Probation Officer of the Year Award.On Sunday, the Chronicle featured another key person involved with innovative solutions in San Francisco Superior Court - Retired Judge Ina Gyemant - who founded Youth Treatment and Education Court (YTEC),
"The simplest approaches are sometimes the best," said Lisa Lightman, who directs special courts for drug offenders and mentally ill people within the Superior Court system. "What he's doing is extraordinarily unique. It really brings supervision up a notch when you can go out and make contact with people where they live."
San Francisco's Juvenile Drug & Behavioral Health Court. The program, which began in 1997, has since grown and partnered with the San Francisco Unified School District to offer a specialized high school, the Principal Center Collaborative (known as the PCC), that offers integrated behavioral health services alongside a traditional high-school curriculum. Judge Gyemant was awarded a Jefferson Award for her work in establishing YTEC, and will be featured on KPIX Channel 5 tomorrow on the 6pm nightly news.
"The courts aim to break the cycle of reoffending - and doing so is always the top priority of such courts - by tackling some of the underlying causes of crime such as drug and alcohol addiction, housing, education or debt problems. Sentences aim to include programmes to help solve these problems. . .
I want the public to see their courts as an accessible and vital part of their community. Courts that make a visible difference to the day-to-day lives of everyone who lives there, including offenders."
"I had a choice of doing jail time or changing my life and going through treatment," he said. "If you have a choice between doing 2-to-7 or going through the program and going into treatment, any smart person would take the program."
Fuseyamore, 45, and the father of a 10-year-old son, celebrated 10 years of sobriety in June and has been a mechanic for the New York City Fire Department for six years, according to Dennis Reilly, former director of the Brooklyn Treatment Court. Fuseyamore's story is one of thousands touted by supporters of alternative drug courts.
Read the full article from USA Today here, which presents a fantastic examination of the Drug Court movement nationwide.
Also check out Changing the Court, which has featured several of their own success stories alongside this most recent USA Today article.
San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi, whose office defends low-level offenders, lends support to developing Community Justice Center, seen December 6 with San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom and San Francisco District Attorney Kamala HarrisPhotos by Bill Wilson © 2007; SF Sentinel
Until six months ago, Stacy Randolph lived on the streets of Pittsburg and shoplifted random items -- clothing, electronics, alcohol -- to sell for drug money.
The 37-year-old woman did not take medication for her serious
depression. She saw her seven children infrequently when she was not, "druggin', buggin' and stealin'." She was incarcerated in County Jail in Martinez six times in the past three years. . .
"As debate rages over how to solve San Francisco's seemingly intractable homeless problem, city leaders, academic researchers and even some formerly homeless people themselves say progress is being made every Thursday afternoon inside Department 15 at the city's gloomy Hall of Justice. . ." Read More
". . .Winters was the type of hard-core homeless guy who gave San Francisco politicians heartburn, and made tax-paying citizens feel simultaneously guilty and resentful. He was part of a troubling problem that everyone wishes would go away.Read MoreNow, although he still looks like a street-dweller with his long, greasy gray hair and grungy sweatshirts, he's a success story. He gets his shot of medication every two weeks, and lives a stable life under the roof of the Ambassador Hotel. An examination of his case shows exactly what it takes to get one troubled homeless person off the street. It shows that there are solutions to San Francisco's homeless problem — but they're expensive and time-consuming, and it's an open question as to whether citizens are willing to pay the bill. . ."